I recently posed this question on Facebook:
How do you define marriage? Would you say marriage is:
A Democracy where everyone gets a vote
A Dictatorship where one person is responsible for decisions and directions of the relationship.
An Equal Partnership where EVERYTHING is shared equally
For this discussion, marriage is defined as the legally or formally recognized union of two people as partners in a personal relationship. Historically, in most cultures, married women had very few rights of their own. But for purposes of this writing, marriage refers to the general definition of marriage in the western world; specifically the U.S.
Most that commented defined marriage as all of the above. Other common thoughts were we should marry our best friend and that marriages should emulate Jesus and the Bride of Christ. And, I would agree with “all of the above”.
In the New Testament, the image of Christ coming for his bride is presented. It is through these scriptures that we see the devotion of the bridegroom and the readiness of the bride. The ideals of commitment, love and servant-hood are woven throughout the picture we are given. It’s the perfect blending.
Unfortunately, today’s marriages are not that perfect. I would venture that most of the couples that get married or are planning to marry in this day and age envision a 50-50 partnership. Everything is shared: money, household chores, care of the children, etc. This is an almost impossible ideal to meet. One or both of the people involved will feel that they are giving more than their 50%, whether it’s through money earned and contributed or time spent around the home.
When the Equal Partnership doesn’t seem to providing on the equality front, democracy may come to the forefront. Both sides begin to “campaign” for their own interests. Both sides are able to lay all their cards on the table and come to an agreement on how responsibilities, money, time, etc. should be divided. During rational times, this is a good method. The flaw comes to play when there in no “majority”, no winner or agreement. And that’s when, the marriage often moves into the Dictatorship phase.
In a dictatorship, one person is responsible for decisions that are made. There are circumstances where a decision has to be made whether it is popular or not. The “dictator” makes that decision and proceeds for better or worse.
In a healthy marriage, all of the things occur. We both work. My job keeps me away from home a majority of the day and as a result, most of the cooking and household decisions fall on my husband. We don’t split them equally at all. I try to do my part on the weekends. And, he does ask for my help, too. There is no “honey-do” list that must be completed for either of us. When decisions arise that are not of the day-to-day variety, we do discuss them and try to come to an agreement. There here have been times when my husband has had to make decisions that I could not or would not make. I didn’t necessarily like it, but I knew that it was for the best and I would acquiesce to his authority at that time. And, I’ll be honest, there are times that I have done the same thing. So, you can say that my marriage is all of the above.
Many relationships fail because the “mix” isn’t palatable. One person may feel they do “everything around the house”. Or, they don’t feel they have a say in any of the decisions made. Maybe one person is a perfectionist and likes things done a particular way and just can’t accept any variations. The key to getting through all of this is communication. You have to be able to talk. What you may perceive as laziness on your partner’s part, may actually be hopelessness because nothing will please you. Or, it may be defensiveness: no adult wants to be treated like a child in their own home.
Customs and traditions concerning marriage in this country have morphed over the years. Cohabitation has increased by nearly 900% over the last 50 years. The focus often becomes “THE WEDDING” instead of the marriage. The average cost of a wedding is at an all time high of $31,213. On average, researchers concluded that couples who lived together before they tied the knot saw a 33 percent higher rate of divorce than those who waited to live together until after they were married. Part of the problem was that cohabitors, studies suggested, “slid into” marriage without much consideration. Instead of making a conscious decision to share an entire life together, couples who shared a dog, a dresser, a blender, were picking marriage over the inconvenience of a break up. Meg Jay, a clinical psychologist, outlined the “cohabitation effect” in a widely circulated New York Times op-ed in 2012.
When we look at marriage as a life-long commitment to serve our partner not just as an escape from life alone, the decisions we make and the actions we take may be different. We may have to leave behind the baggage of past family relationships. Just because our parents did it this way, doesn’t mean that it’s the best decision for our family. If my goal as a wife is to serve my husband to be best of my ability, to provide for his comfort, to encourage and support him, to love and treat him as my best friend, then our marriage will survive and maybe even prosper. But, it takes a conscious decision to be that servant. It means that I don’t always get what I want. It means that I may have to accomplish everything on the honey-do list instead of demanding my husband does so. Someone else will have to take priority over me.
That’s the example that Christ gave for his bride, the Church.